<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdSense Optimization Report and MFAs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/</link>
	<description>a place of wonder and geekery...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Steve. And I agree with you. After deleting my &quot;blocked&quot; list, my CPC fell, same as yours. So now I just ignore the &quot;optimization report&quot; every month, because I&#039;m NOT deleting the MFA&#039;s.

Even if Google is supposedly going after them. Because MFA might stand for &quot;Made for AdSense&quot;, but I reckon they&#039;ve just switched over to other advertising networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Steve. And I agree with you. After deleting my &#8220;blocked&#8221; list, my CPC fell, same as yours. So now I just ignore the &#8220;optimization report&#8221; every month, because I&#8217;m NOT deleting the MFA&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Even if Google is supposedly going after them. Because MFA might stand for &#8220;Made for AdSense&#8221;, but I reckon they&#8217;ve just switched over to other advertising networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geniosity.co.za/musings/google/adsense-optimization-report-and-mfas/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I too have definitely been punished for having a large list of blocked advertisers. The thing is, every one of them was a spammy, MFA or very low click value site. As an experiment I unblocked them all and - POW! - traffic went up by 25% the next day. A coincidence? I don&#039;t think so.

The only problem was that my earnings plummeted. After a few days I was getting a pathetic 2c per click average. Why would anyone bother writing good quality content to be paid that? So as far as I see it, Google needs to pull their finger out and sort the crap out. If Google can&#039;t do it then let us do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I too have definitely been punished for having a large list of blocked advertisers. The thing is, every one of them was a spammy, MFA or very low click value site. As an experiment I unblocked them all and &#8211; POW! &#8211; traffic went up by 25% the next day. A coincidence? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>The only problem was that my earnings plummeted. After a few days I was getting a pathetic 2c per click average. Why would anyone bother writing good quality content to be paid that? So as far as I see it, Google needs to pull their finger out and sort the crap out. If Google can&#8217;t do it then let us do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

